Back 1
2 3
4 5 6 7
Next
Now there's good news and bad news about this point of view
that I'm presenting to you. The good news is this: all of the
men who I know who have been successful in overcoming homosexuality
have said that one of the things that had to happen is they had
to learn they weren't as different from other men as they thought
they were. They thought they were incredibly different; they had
universally overinterpreted themselves as being vastly different
than other people. And I look at my clients all the time and tell
them, “Here's the good news: I can say with complete confidence,
I believe with all my heart that there is no difference between
you and me with regard to something called sexual orientation
or homosexuality. No difference. There is no difference between
us, except this: you can remember how to be sexually aroused by
other men because you've done it. I can't remember how to do it
because I've never done it.”
Gay rights activists sometimes say, “You think we can become
straight? Well, could you become gay?” And my response is,
“Probably. I would prefer not to--it seems to cause a lot
of hassle in people's lives. I've got my own hassles, thank you
very much.” But I do believe that most people could probably
change and be oriented in a different way. That's the good news.
The bad news is this: if the metaphor we use is one of disease,
we would hope to find a cure. If it was a wound, we would wait
for the wound to heal; if it was a condition, we would look for
treatments for the condition. But if this is a memory, if this
is something I can remember how to do, how do you get rid of a
memory? Amnesia? I will look at clients all the time and say,
“For you to completely lose the ability to ever be sexually
aroused by another man”--now losing the ability is different
than losing the compulsion or the habit, but to lose the ability
so you just couldn't do it--“that would be about as easy
as if I were to say, ‘Rudolph the Red-Nosed…', and
for you not to think ‘Reindeer.'”
How would you do that? Well, they say, “Well, I would
substitute something.” Okay, I would sing “Rudolph
the Red-Nosed Buffalo” 50,000 times, and pretty soon “buffalo”
is coming to mind more readily than “reindeer.” But
guess what? Every once in a while out of nowhere, random firing
of neurons in the game--“reindeer” comes back into
my mind: “Rudolph the Red-Nosed Buffalo,” “Rudolph
the Red-Nosed Reindeer.” Now what do I do? I'll show you
what you might do if you were emotionally sensitive and very introspective
and strongly perfectionistic. You might do something like this:
“Reindeer…Oh, no, reindeer! I did reindeer again;
I can't believe it! I still have this reindeer orientation! It's
always going to be reindeer! I can't believe it! All of my prayers,
all of the therapy, all of the work, it's ruined--it's reindeer,
reindeer, reindeer! I'm never going to be--it's reindeer! It's
going to be reindeer my whole life! I can't believe I'll never
be but a reindeer!”
What have I just done? Strongly solidified the interpretation,
reinforced it; instead of saying it once, I said it a dozen times
with great emotional emphasis. That's what many of these young
men do. What we try to get them to do is do something like this:
“Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer…Oh, I used to do that
a lot…Rudolph the Red-Nosed Buffalo,” and go on, move
on, decrease their emotional reactivity to this. It's a key component
in treating this problem and very, very difficult to do. They
believe that they're supposed to fight it with all of their heart,
that they should have strong emotional reactions to it, that that's
what a good person would do. But it just digs them deeper and
deeper like a man struggling in quicksand is pulled lower and
lower.
Now I want to talk to you quickly about how this problem develops.
Okay, Jeff, if it's an interpretation, if it's meaning, if it's
not a thing that people have that makes them feel this way, how
does the story get started? How do they develop that interpretation?
Well, there are some fairly common patterns, and I want to talk
about two of the most common today.
The first is very simple and straightforward: a young man hears
in preadolescent years or early adolescent years about chastity,
virtue. And he makes up his mind at a very deep level that he
is not going to think sexual thoughts about women. And he moves
all women into a category like his sister or his mother--he would
never do that, they're too pure, too sacred to think that way
about. But nobody ever said anything to him in a sacrament meeting
talk or a priesthood lesson about thinking that way about men.
And there is somewhat less resistance to thinking that way about
men because they hadn't been warned or taught about that. In addition,
they are men; they get to see themselves in the mirror, they get
to go to the locker room. There's less of a barrier there. And
so I will often talk to clients and say, “If you were to
have explicit sexual fantasies about a girl that were just as
explicit and real as the fantasies you might have about guys,
which would you feel most guilty about?” And almost all
of them will say, “I'd feel more guilty about thinking that
way about a girl.” I'd say, “Really? Would you feel
twice as guilty?” “Yeah, twice as guilty.” “Three
times as guilty?” “Yes, three times as guilty.”
“Four times as guilty?” “Hmm, not sure.”
Three to four times as much guilt thinking about women that way
as about men; see how someone who is introspective and wants to
be good gets caught up in that pattern?
Second pattern, a little bit more complicated but even more
universally true. And when I present this to men, nine out of
ten at least will say to me, “You have just described my
life. You have just described me. How did you know?” Well,
I ask. Here's how that pattern goes; this is what men will say
to me: first, “I have always felt different from or rejected
by other men or boys.” For some men, this has to do with
the relationship with their father; some felt distant from their
father or felt that their father didn't approve of them. Some
didn't like their father, didn't want to be like him. But for
many men, it doesn't have much to do with their father at all;
traditional psychoanalytic ways of viewing this problem say it's
always about the father, but I run into men all the time who say
they had good relationships with their dad. The traditional viewpoint
on that is, “Well, you might have thought you had a good
relationship with your dad, but we'll get down to it.” But
I believe them.
Some it was just relationships with peers: they might have been
made fun of, or felt different, called “gay” or “fag”
or other kinds of names when they were growing up. Some were left
out of activities, some just simply did not like traditional masculine
activities like sports or cars or other kinds of things; they
were drawn more to artistic endeavors. They're more expressive,
they were more verbal. They like art or music or drama or other
kinds of things. But in somewhere in there, they felt different
from or rejected by other men. Because of this, they began to
focus on other boys very intently; almost obsessively they focused
and thought about other boys, and that focus took one or more
of three different forms.
The first was envy; they did a lot of comparing: “Why can't
I be like other guys? I am so different. Why can't I have that
guy's good looks, that guy's popularity, that guy's muscles, that
guy's body, that guy's sexual development, that guy's popularity?”
Lots and lots of comparing.
Second way that they focused on other boys was wanting to belong;
they saw people walking around friends, buddies, slapping each
other on the back, being friends, and they wanted to belong. They
wanted to fit in. They wanted to be cared about and included.
Third way they focused on other people: fascination and curiosity.
They found them just intriguing, these other men, they were intrigued
by their masculinity, by their sexual development, intrigued by
them aesthetically--they found them beautiful. So in one or more,
often all three different ways, they became very focused on other
men.
Back 1
2 3
4 5 6 7
Next